CHANDRAPAL SINGH
Rajaram Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Dharamchand – Respondent
( 1. ) THE petitioner seeks interference with the order of the Second Additional Judge to the Court of the Sessions Judge, Mandsaur in Criminal Revision No 38 for 1978, quashing the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Mandsaur in Criminal Case No. 844 of 1977 of 6-31978 discharging the accused-petitioners (and others of offences punishable under Secs. 120-B, 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code, and remanding the case to the trial Court (the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandsaur) for disposal of the case according to law and directing the Magistrate to possibly frame a charge under Section 409 Indian Penal Code also, if so made out after the evidence for the prosecution.
( 2. ) THE Gwalior Maize products Ltd. Mandsaur was a registered company under the then Gwalior Companies Act and is deemed to be registered under the Indian Companies Act with its registered office at Mandsaur. It appears that the respondent No, 1 Dharamchand on his own behalf and on behalf of respondent No. 2 Bapulal on 12-3-1977 preferred a complaint against the accused-petitioners of whom the petitioner No. 1 Rajaram Gupta is the father and co-petitioner 2, 3 and 4, his sons, and three others i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.