SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(MP) 548

CHANDRAPAL SINGH
Rajaram Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Dharamchand – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner seeks interference with the order of the Second Additional Judge to the Court of the Sessions Judge, Mandsaur in Criminal Revision No 38 for 1978, quashing the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Mandsaur in Criminal Case No. 844 of 1977 of 6-31978 discharging the accused-petitioners (and others of offences punishable under Secs. 120-B, 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code, and remanding the case to the trial Court (the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandsaur) for disposal of the case according to law and directing the Magistrate to possibly frame a charge under Section 409 Indian Penal Code also, if so made out after the evidence for the prosecution.

( 2. ) THE Gwalior Maize products Ltd. Mandsaur was a registered company under the then Gwalior Companies Act and is deemed to be registered under the Indian Companies Act with its registered office at Mandsaur. It appears that the respondent No, 1 Dharamchand on his own behalf and on behalf of respondent No. 2 Bapulal on 12-3-1977 preferred a complaint against the accused-petitioners of whom the petitioner No. 1 Rajaram Gupta is the father and co-petitioner 2, 3 and 4, his sons, and three others i

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top