SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 328

A.R.NAVKAR
SACHCHINDANAND GARG – Appellant
Versus
GOVINDLALJIMAHARAJ NATHDWARA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.B.MANGAL, K.S.AGRAWAL,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is an appeal against the Judgment and decree passed by the Third Additional District Judge, Gwalior, dated 13-3-1978, which was passed in Civil appeal No. 78a of 1977 which was preferred against the Judgment and decree passed by the Fourth Civil Judge, Class II, Gwalior in Civil Suit No. 120a of 1963 Original Civil, on 26-4-1977.

( 2. ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal are that the plaintiff-respondent landlord filed a suit for eviction from residential accommodation against the defendant-appellant on the ground that the defendant-appellant has purchased a house in the name of his wife situated at Daulatganj, Lashkar, The plaintiff-respondent verbally told the defendant that he has purchased a house and as such he should vacate the disputed premises. Further, it was also stated that the defendant has damaged the cement sheets and has caused loss to the plaintiff. It was further stated by an amendment in the plaint that the defendant has opened a window in the suit house towards the Dharmashala. A notice regarding all these facts was given on 29-3-1963 to the defendant and for termination of tenancy also. As the suit premises were not vacated by the defendan




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top