SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 571

G.P.SINGH, FAIZAN UDDIN
Anand Rao – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Prisons – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner who is a prisoner in the Central Jail, Gwalior seeks quashing of an order dated 22nd April, 1981 passed by the Inspector-General of Prisons by which remission of four months and three days earned by the petitioner has been forfeited. The main grievance of the petitioner in the petition is that no opportunity was given to him to explain his conduct before imposing the punishment.

( 2. ) WE have heard Shri D. M. Dharma-dhikari as amicus curiae who has taken us through the relevant provisions, and Shri Rajendra Tiwari, Government Advocate for the respondents.

( 3. ) SECTION 45 of the Prisons Act enumerates the acts which are prison offences. Section 59 further authorises the State Government to make rules on various matters mentioned in that section. One of the matters mentioned is "defining the acts which shall constitute prison offences. " Thus, by rules, the State Government can supplement the prison offences enumerated in Section 45. Rule 723 in the Jail Manual enumerates the acts which are also prison offences. Abetting the commission of any prison offence, which is item No. 8 in Rule 723, is it




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top