SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(MP) 737

H.G.MISHRA
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
FATMABAI BHURA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.HARTIWAL, N.C.BAHAI, V.K.DUBEY,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is an appeal under section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 against the order dated 25-10-1975 passed by the Commissioner for Workmens Compensation, Indore, awarding compensation in favour of the claimant-respondents Nos. I, 2 and 3.

( 2. ) THE facts giving rise to the present appeal are as under:-The claimant-respondents Nos. I, 2 and 3 submitted an application under section 22 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on 23-2-1973 for award of compensation before the Commissioner for Workmens Compensation, Indore, on the allegations that Bhura was husband of Smt. Fatmabai-claimant No. I and father of Saleem and raisa-claimants No. 2 and 3. Bhura was a workman employed as operator of Driller-Tractor No. RJQ 5735 by Jamnalal. On 14-11-1972, Bhura received personal injury by accident ar sing out and in the course of his employment. The injury so sustained by him resulted in death of Bhura on the spot. The cause of this injury was that Bhura was travelling from Bhilwara to burhanpur with the said Driller-Tractor as an operator as directed by jamnalal. At that time, Bhura was incharge of the Driller-Tractor which was load


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top