SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 1

G.P.SINGH, R.C.SHRIVASTAVA
Ramesh Chemical Industries – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner challenges the order dated 15th Oct. 1975 passed by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Raipur, and the order dated 5th March, 1976 passed by the Appellate Collector, Central Excise, New Delhi.

( 2. ) THE petitioner is a partnership firm registered under the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act. The petitioner, amongst others carries on the business of repacking glucose in small packets. The petitioner purchases glucose from M/s. Anil Starch Products Ltd. and M/s. Maize Products, Ahrnedabad packed in bags. The petitioner repacks glucose in small cartons and tin containers with the label containing trade mark of Eagle Brand. The manufacturers namely, M/s. Anil Starch Products Ltd. and M/s. Maize Products, from whom the petitioner purchases glucose in bulk, pay excise duty under Tariff Item No. 1-E of Schedule 1 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and put on every bag and bills the specific wording "not for Medical Use". The view taken by the Asstt. Collector and the Appellate Collector is that repacking of glucose done by the petitioner amounted to "manufacture" within the definiti













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top