SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 421

G.G.SOHANI, R.K.VIJAYWARGIYA
Sales Tax Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Dhameja Home Industries – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.S.Jain, S.R.JOSHI,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) BY this reference under Section 44 (1) of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, hereinafter referred to as the Act, the Board of Revenue has referred the following question of law to this Court for its opinion : Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the preparation of garam masala would amount to manufacture as defined under Section 2 (j) of the Act.

( 2. ) THE material facts giving rise to this reference briefly are as follows : The assessee deals in condiments and he was assessed to sales tax for the financial year 1969-70. The gross turnover of the assessee was determined by the assessing authority at Rs. 1,94,000 which included the sale of garam masala worth Rs. 13,135. 14. Garam masala was treated by the assessing authority as the product of a process of manufacture and hence was excluded from the goods for which rebate was given. On appeal preferred by the assessee the contention advanced on behalf of the assessee that garam masala was not a product of a manufacturing process was rejected. On further appeal the Board held that the preparation of garam masala was expressly excluded from the definition of "manufacture" by the Rules framed unde





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top