SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(MP) 349

M.D.BHATT
HARISINGH MUNNALALJI – Appellant
Versus
KADARSINGH DAULATSINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M.DEO, V.K.DUBEY,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is the defendant No. 1 s revision against the lower appellate Courts Order dated 14-11-1977 whereby he was directed to be detained in the civil prison for a term of 15 days for disobedience of the interim exparte injunction granted against him during the pendency of the suit.

( 2. ) NON-APPLICANTS No. 1 to 4 (plaintiffs) had filed the suit against the applicant-defendant No. 1 and the non-applicant No. 5 (defendant No. 2)for declaration of their right and title to the piece of land as per the plaint schedule and for permanent injunction, restraining the applicant-defendant no. 1 and the non-applicant No. 5 (defendant No. 2), from interfering in the plaintiffs possession. On 31-1-1970, interim exparte injunction was passed against the applicant-defendant No. 1 and the non-applicant No. 5 peru, restraining them to sell the suit land and the house thereon, until further orders. This interim temporary injunction Order was served on the applicant-defendant No. 1 on 18-2-1970. The said interim temporary injunction Order was, however, vacated on 17-6-1970. Plaintiffs suit was also finally dismissed. The applicant-defendant No. 1, during the period when the interim exp






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top