SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(MP) 145

J.S.VERMA, C.P.SEN
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Chandra Verma – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) BY this order the references made in Criminal Revision No. 1] of 1976, Basudeosingh v. State of M. P. , Criminal Revision No. 12 of 1976, Basudeosingh v. State of M. P. and Criminal Revision No. 13 of 1976, Basudeosingh v. State of M. P. , are also answered.

( 2. ) THE following questions have been referred to the Division Bench for consideration:

1. Whether the State Government is empowered under Section 11 (1) of the New Code to appoint Judicial Magistrate of a particular district to have his headquarters outside the district? 2. Whether one person so appointed by this Court to be the Judicial Magistrate of different districts to try all C B. I. cases aris- ing in those districts can have his headquarters at one particular place

( 3. ) IF the State Government and the High Court are so empowered to issue notifications, then what should be the forum of appeal against the judgments and orders passed by such Magistrate?

3. In Criminal Revision No. 92 of 1976, the non-applicant was prosecuted for the offences under Sections 420 and 465, I. P. C. by the Special Police Establishment of the Central Government, for having cheated the Heavy Electricals Limited, Bhopal, and als













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top