SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(MP) 469

P.D.MULYE, FAIZAN UDDIN
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Ratna Fine Arts Printing Press – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.M.Chaphekar, S.R.JOSHI,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is a reference under Section 44 (1) of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") made by the Board of Revenue referring the following question of law for the opinion of this Court:

Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, when a printer produces for a customer an article which is of value only to the particular customer, whether only the material used in producing this article or the total price of the finished article will be liable to sales tax ?

( 2. ) THE facts in brief giving rise to this reference may be stated thus : The non-applicant M/s. Ratna Fine Arts Printing Press, the owner of a printing press was assessed to tax by the Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Ujjain, for the period from 1st April, 1968, to 31st March, 1969, by his order dated 20th May, 1970. The gross turnover was determined at Rs. 18,000. The taxable turnover was also determined at the same figure and a sum of Rs. 1,260 was assessed as tax payable by the assessee. A penalty of Rs. 100 was imposed under Section 17 (3) of the Act and a penalty of Rs. 15 was also imposed under Rule 69-A. In the first appeal by the assessee before the Appellate Assistan






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top