1983 Supreme(MP) 340
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
M. D. Bhatt, J.
NANNUSINGH NAHARSINGH RAJPUT
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Decided On : Sep 13,1983
K.L.KATHAL, RAJENDRA SINGH,
Headnote:(1) Evidence Act, 1872-S 9-partisan and inimical witnesses-cannot be discarded all together-their evidence should be examined with abundant caution.
The law is well settled that even in the matter of partisan or inimical witnesses, one has simply to scrutinize their evidence with abundant caution, to ensure that innocent persons are not unnecessarily roped in. AIR 1978 SC 1647, relied on.
In a faction-ridden society where an occurrence takes place, to reject the entire evidence on the sole ground that it is partisan, is to shut one's eyes to the realities of the rural life in our country. Large number of accused would go unpunished if such an easy course is charted. The law is equally well settled that the principle of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus does not apply to criminal trials; and it is the duty of the Court to separate the grain from the chaff instead of rejecting the prosecution case on general grounds. AIR 1980 SC 957 relied on. [Para 8
(2) Criminal P. C. 1973-S.357 (3)-as concerned in M. P.-victims members of Schedule Tribes and Scheduled Castes-payment of separate compensation is mandatory-trial Court not imposing fines on accused persons to pay to the victims-High Court has to do this in appeal.
It is unfortunate that the trial Court has not considered this aspect of the matter and has totally ignored sub-section (3) of section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as stands amended in this State by M. P. Act No. 29 of 1978, whereby, payment of separate compensation to the victims belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as defined in clauses (24) and (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution has been made mandatory.
Since separate compensation was not awarded, it is just and proper that the High Court may impose sentence fine on the accused persons and to pass appropriate sentence of fine also and to determine separate amount of compensation to the victims. [Para 14
( 1. ) THIS is the appeal of the eight accused persons viz. Mannusingh, Abhaysingh, Jagdish Singh, Naharua//as Naharsingh, Khushal singh, Karan Singh, Indersingh and Nawal, who on their convictions under sections 147, 429 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code have each been sentenced to respective terms of imprisonment of one year, two years and eight years, with the direction for the concurrent running of these sentences.
( 2. ) VILLAGE Bihar of the district East Nimar comprises of a little over 100 houses, inhabited by Thakurs and also Bhils, belonging to aboriginal tribe. From mid-noon till later afternoon on 15-5-1982; about 41 houses and some thrashing grounds, all mostly of Bhils, were gutted with fire and were destroyed. In this village, not only the household effects and other sundry articles were destroyed but 34 cattle including 23 goats (grown-up as well as younger ones), one bullock and some calves were also roasted to death, and this apart, two bullocks and seven goats were sufficiently burnt and injured (P. W. 17 Dr. Chenana ). All such damage, consequent to the burning of the houses, household effects, grain and cattle was to the tune of about Rs. 1,13,458 00 (Rs. one lac, thirteen thousand, four hundred fifty eight), as assessed by the Police Investigation Agency, vide the detailed list ex. P-4.
( 3. ) THE case of the prosecution, in short, was that all the appellants-accused and one Salim alias Salirauddin, now absconding, just before the alleged incident, started hurling abuses at P. W. 1 Kachru Bhil and others, and then collected at the house of the accused Indersingh and after the firing of some pistol-shots by Salim and the throwing of hand-grenades from the house-top of Indersingh, all emerged from the said house armed with lethal weapons viz. fire-arms, ballam, pharsi etc. and also buckets filled with kerosene oil, and then started on their rampage, burning the houses of the bhils and others,-the first place burnt down was the mandap of P. W. 1 kachru and then the adjoined house of Dagdu; and then further, the houses of the rest of the respective persons, as detailed in the list Ex. P. 4.
( 4. ) THE appellants-accused Jagdish and Abhaysing were stated to be carrying in turn the buckets full of kerosene oil; and the absconding accused Salim, all along continued, setting fire to the houses, cattle sheds and thrashing grounds, with the help of rag covered wooden sticks (torches) doused with kerosene oil. Rest of the appellants accused, all the while, were brandishing their weapons and threatening the victims with usual filthy abuses, making the victims flee from the village to safer places. The police of P. S. Pipalod, in the meanwhile, was apprised of the incident. Consequently, the police arrived at the scene; and the fire-brigade extinguished the fire with the help of victims and their sympathisers. Some seizures of burnt and damaged articles were made on the spot Fired empty cartridges were also seized from certain places. One fire-arm with cartridges was later recovered and seized from the accused Abhaysingh. Damage was got assessed and the injured cattle were got treated; and after due investigation, all the appellants accused were put up for trial for commission of the very many offences including the ones, of which, they now stand convicted. All the appellants-accused abjured the guilt in the trial Court.
( 5. ) THE appellants-accused Jagdish and Indersingh pleaded alibi and claimed to be at Khandwa proper on the relevant date of the incident. The rest claimed to be falsely implicated. It was specifically contended by them that they were not responsible for the fire in the village. According to them, one Rajendra Singh Thakur, with his band of followers, comprised of Bhils had mobbed the house of Indersingh and hurled stones and brick-bats on the house, had opened fire-shots, had thrown hand-grenades and had finally set fire to the Payga (cattle-shed) of Indersingh, and then to the house of one Naw