( 1. ) HEARD Shri N. C. Behal, learned counsel for the appellant on the question of admission. Also considered the grounds in I. A. No. 3216 of 1984. This order shall also govern the disposal of Misc. Appeal No. 188 of 1984 (E. S. I. Corporation v. Niranjanlal Purohit), Misc. Appeal No. 201 of 1984 (E. S. I. Corpn. v. Chhotelal), Misc. Appeal No. 205 of 1984 (E. S. I. Corpn. v. Balwantsingh), Misc. Appeal No. 206 of 1984 (E. S. I. Corpn. v. Jairam) and Misc. Appeal No. 211 of 1984 (E. S. I. Corpn. v. Mahendrakumar), as all these appeals involve similar questions on identical facts.

( 2. ) THIS appeal and the other connected appeals referred to above, preferred under section 82 (2) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have a common feature that the respondents in all these appeals are employees of the Vinod or the Vimal Mills, ujjain.

( 3. ) THE learned counsel for the appellants started with section 2 (8)of the Act, defining the employment injury and thereafter referred to this court section 49 and section 51 of the Act. He also referred to Regulations nos. 51, 53, 61 and 64 of the Employees State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1