B.M.LAL, G.L.OZA
ALI AHMED AND SONS BILASPUR – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1. ) THIS petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India raises the question about validity of a temporary permit granted under section 62 (1) (c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the act) in favour of the respondent No. 2 by the respondent No. 1, the Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur, for the route, Bilaspur to Korba via Katghora for 4 months which is valid upto 14-8-1984. The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 11-4-1984 contained in Annexure B, passed by the Regional Transport Authority, respondent No, 1 and also the permit, Annexure-C, issued to the respondent no. 2 in pursuance of the said order.
( 2. ) FACTS leading to this case are that the petitioner is holding regular permits for the route, Bilaspur to Katghora and Katghora to Korba on the following timings: bilaspur Katghora dep. 2. 30 P. M. Arr. 4. 50 P. M.
Katghora. . . Korba dept. 5. 00 P. M. Arr. 6. 30 P. M. The respondent No. 2 applied for grant of temporary permit for four months for the route, Bilaspur to Korba via Katghora by his application dated 2-3-1984, Annexure A, under section 62 (1) (c) of the Act.
( 3. ) THE respondent No. 1 by his order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.