SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(MP) 541

T.N.SINGH
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
SHANTIBAI HIRASINGH KUSHWAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.D.AGRAWAL, R.K.Shinde,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS meritless appeal merits instant dismissal. Forceful argument of panel Lawyer Shri Agarwal has failed to move me to hold that interference in favour of the appellant is warranted in this appeal. Indeed, lamentably, the claim allowed being on the low side, it is the respondent who is rightly aggrieved, but it is not within my competence in this appeal to assist him liberally as there is no cross-appeal by her.

( 2. ) A healthy lad of 14 years, a bright student with a promising career, lost his life seven years ago. His mother preferred a claim under section 110-A of the Motor vehicles Act and she was awarded a petty sum of Rs. 25000/- only as compensation. State has appealed against the award, which must be labelled as a very unholy endeavour to deny her the poor pittance frugally granted against the claim of Rs. 1,80,000/ -. The deceaseds father was earning at the relevant time, a monthly income of Rs. 1,000/- and he was well-disposed and equipped to educate his only child on whom, eventually, he and his wife had to depend in their old age. The claim awarded being on the low side, I see no reason for any interference in the appeal. The faint endeavour of Shri Ag





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top