SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 148

V.D.GYANI
LAXMANSINGH RAMSAHAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.KUTUMBALE, G.S.Solanki,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner has been convicted on his pleading guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 800/- or to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment in default of payment of fine, by the Motor Vehicles Magistrate Indore.

( 2. ) A Rubber Stamp Order has been made use of. An appeal preferred by the petitioner also met with a dismissal but the amount of fine has been reduced from Rs. 800/- to Rs. 300/ -.

( 3. ) THE Appellate Court has observed that the charge was properly read over to the petitioner. The order-sheet is nothing but a specimen seal impression which reads as follows :- Reading this order-sheet, it is nothing but a rubber stamp impression of a seal, it is difficult to conceive of a judicial order, being reduced to such a mechanism. The order-sheet itself proceeds on the assumption, mat copies of the charge-sheet furnished, (b) charge read-over and explained to the accused (c) accused pleaded guilty to the charge (d) order passed thereon and fine deposited by the accused, case be consigned to the record. This rubber-stamp order-sheet does not even envisage a situation where possibly an accused pleaded guilty to the charge nor does it take into account a situation in




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top