SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 215

K.L.SHRIVASTAVA
R K CHARAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.R.Joshi, SURJEETSING,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 5-7-1984 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Mandsaur in Criminal Case No. 72 of 1984 whereby he has held that sanction as contemplated under section 197 of the Code of criminal Procedure 1973 (for short the Code) is not necessary. ( 2. ) THE facts giving rise to the petition are these. The petitioner is a Town inspector of Police in the employment of the State of Madhya Pradesh.

( 3. ) IN exercise of powers under section 102 of the Code the Police Mandsaur had effected seizure of ornaments and silver from one Shobhalal. On 17-1-1984, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Mandsaur ordered that the property be returned to shobhalal on Supratnama on furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 10,000/ -. The petitioner did not comply with the order.

( 4. ) ON a report being made to the Chief Judicial Magistrate Mandsaur that his order regarding return of the property was not complied with and Shobhalal was dealt with in an unbecoming manner, an inquiry was made. ( 5. ) AFTER inquiry the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate filed a complaint under section 166, Indian Penal Code, against the petitioner.

( 6. ) THE







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top