SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 213

T.N.SINGH
GHANSHYAMDAS GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SHIVALDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.D.Jain,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) ON 9-10-1985 the instant petitioner, Ghanshyamdas Gupta, impleading his brothers, Ramjidas Gupta and Haridas Gupta (herein proforma non-petitioners Nos. 3 and 4) also, albeit as proforma applicants, moved the Rent Controlling Authority, Gwalior, for shot, the Authority, under Section 23-A of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, for short, the Act for an order against non-petitioners No. 1 and 2 for their eviction from the suit premises. The application having been rejected the instant revision in preferred under Section 23-E of the Act. All the non-petitioners having been duly noticed, on their failure to enter appearance to oppose the revision SPC to each of them was also duly issued. Still, there is no appearance even today on their behalf and as such I have no option except to decide the matter looking into the records and the case law cited by Shri R. D. Jain counsel for the petitioner.

( 2. ) IN his application the applicant stated that he was a retired Government servant who has rendered service in Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, under the central Government, as a Professor in the said institution, upto 18-7-1983. Because he wanted to set up private





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top