( 1. ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of M. P. No. 1385 of 1988 Ku. Manorama Singhal v. P. S. C. , Indore and three Ors. , M. P. No. 1393 of 1988 Narendra Kumar Choudhary v. M. P. Public Service Commission, Indore and M. P. State, M. P. No. 1403 of 1988 Ku. Asha Pandey v. State of M. P. and P. S. C. , Indore, M. P. No. 1406 of 1988 Pawan Kumar Gupta v. Madhya Pradesh P. S. C. and Anr. and M. P. No. 1407 of 1988 Bhanwarlal v. M. P. Public Service Commission, Indore and State of M. P. All these petitions are directed against the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission.

( 2. ) THE grievance of the petitioners, in all these petitions, is that the petitioners though qualified to be appointed as Labour Judge in the M. P. Labour Judiciary Service, they have not been called for interview by the Public Service Commission. The yard-stick adopted by the Public Service Commission is discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious. Therefore, all the petitioners have prayed that the M. P. Public Service Commission be directed to call the petitioners for interview for recruitment as Presiding Officer, Labour Court in the M. P. Labour Judicial Service of the State.

( 3. ) IT is a common g