SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 86

B.C.VERMA, S.AWASTHY
Sahdeo Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D.Deoras, Rama Gupta,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS petition by a social worker concerned with the welfare of the labourers in Chhattisgarh region of this State has been filed with a view to prevent exploitation of labourers engaged in business of lac manufactory in that region and particularly in Dhamtari Tahsil of Raipur District. It appears that the petitioner found that the poor labourers employed by the manufacturers of lac are being paid very low wages and are subjected to forced labour. He appears to have been moved by the low wages paid to these labourers and, therefore, has moved this petition to safeguard the interests of labourers thus victimised by the rich lac manufacturers. The contention is that though lac manufactory is a scheduled employment under the Minimum Wages Act, still minimum wages have not been fixed in this lac industry. Only Rs. 4. 00 per day is paid to the unskilled labour, while the skilled labour is paid Rs. 7. 60 paise per day. Apart from alleging violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India in not fixing minimum wages for this industry, it is also urged that the respondents have failed in their duties to protect the fundamental right to live, of labourers employed in lac












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top