SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 71

B.B.L.SHRIVASTAVA
Bakulesh – Appellant
Versus
Girdharilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.Dhupar, SUJAN JAIN,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS appeal arises out of award dated 22. 1. 1986 in Claim Case No. 273 of 1981 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Indore, awarding compensation of Rs. 40,000/- to respondent-claimant Girdharilal on account of injuries sustained by him, due to rash and negligent driving of the scooter CPF 5355 by appellant No. 1 which was owned by appellant No. 2 under insurance with appellant No. 3.

( 2. ) THIS appeal is on the ground that the accident in question was for no fault of the scooter driver and the compensation awarded is highly excessive on all items. There are practically no grounds to ignore categorical assertions of victim Girdharilal, PW3, as well as eye-witness Budhaji, PW 2, according to both of whom the scooter in question dashed against the victim from behind, when he was going on foot by the left side of the road. The scooter driver has not entered the witness-box to rebut the aforesaid allegation which gives rise to adverse inference also. Even otherwise, there are no grounds to ignore testimony of the aforesaid witnesses which is sufficient to hold that the accident in question took place on account of rashness and negligence of the scooter driver in vi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top