SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 177

FAIZAN UDDIN, Y.B.SURYAVANSHI
OM PRAKASH KAMTA PRASAD DUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HAMID KHAN, V.P.Singh,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 1215 of 1984 shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 1191 of 1984, Nabbu @ narbad vs. State of M. P. , since both the appeals arise out of the judgment dated 1-10-1984 by the Fourth A. S. J. , Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No. 124 of 1984. The appellants in above appeals are Om Prakash and Nabbu @ Narbad, respectively. Both have been convicted under section 302 read with section 34, Indian Penal code and sentenced to undergo R. I. for life. Furthermore, both have been convicted under sections 294 and 506-11, Indian Penal Code and each has been sentenced to undergo two months and six months R. I. , respectively, with a direction that the sentences shall be concurrent.

( 2. ) BESIDES these two appellants, one Santosh @ Santosh Kumar, was also tried in the said trial, but he has been acquitted of the charge under section 304/34, Indian Penal Code though convicted under sections 294/506 and 506-11, indian Penal Code and also sentenced to undergo two months and six months r. I. respectively. It seems that there is no appeal preferred by him.

( 3. ) ACCORDING to the prosecution, on 25-12-1983, Pohumal Sindhi (deceased) along

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top