SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(MP) 355

R.C.LAHOTI
Ramchandra Singh Jadon – Appellant
Versus
Satya Prakash Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.D.Jain, RAMJI SHARMA,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS is a revision preferred under section 23-E of M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 as amended by Act No. 27/83 by the landlord aggrieved by an order of the Rent Controlling Authority, Gwalior dismissing his application for ejectment of the tenant/non-petitioner under section 23-A (b) of the Act.

( 2. ) IT is not disputed that the suit accommodation is non-residential. It is held by the defendant/non-petitioner tenant of the plaintiff/petitioner. The plaintiff was in Government Service wherefrom he has retired. He has an unmarried daughter by name Mangala, of about 25 years of age.

( 3. ) THE case of the petitioner has been that the daughter does not any longer wish to marry and the plaintiff and his daughter Mangala, both being unemployed for the present, propose to start their own business of stationery and books in the suit accommodation for which purpose they do not have any other accommodation of their own available within the Corporation limits of Gwalior. The defendant/non-petitioner having been allowed leave to defend contested the suit by denying the necessity pleaded by the plaintiff/petitioner. It was also submitted that an earlier suit filed by the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top