SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 95

A.G.QURESHI, S.K.DUBEY
M. P. State Road Transport Corpn. – Appellant
Versus
Bhagiram Yadav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.Dhupar, P.Wasif,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner Corporation has preferred this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the orders passed by the Labour Court and the Industrial Court (Annexures C and E respectively), whereby respondent No. 1 was declared to be classified as permanent Junior Booking Clerk.

( 2. ) THE brief facts leading to this petition are that the respondent No. 1 was initially employed by the petitioner Corporation as a Security Guard and was posted at Neemuch Depot. In compliance of the order dated 10. 6. 1980 of the Divisional Manager, M. P. State road Transport Corporation, respondent No. 1 was deputed to work as such from 13. 6. 1980 and posted to the Rampura Bus Stand for point to point booking. Respondent No. 1 was called back to his parent Department vide order dated 28. 5. 1982. Being aggreived by that order, the respondent No. 1 filed an application under Section 61 (1) (a) (c) read with Section 31 of the M. P. Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") before the Labour Court, Ratlam, contending therein that he worked satisfactorily as a Junior Booking Clerk continuously for more than 6 months. As such, he







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top