SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 109

K.L.SHRIVASTAVA
INDUSINGH – Appellant
Versus
LEELAWATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.Dabir,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS revision petition under Section 23-E of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short the Act) is directed against the order dated 28-11-1987 passed by the learned Rent Controlling Authority, Indore, negativing the petitioners contention that the non-applicants application under Section 23-A of the Act is premature.

( 2. ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the non-applicants became landlords of the tenanted premises on 10-12-1985 on the death of Narendarsingh and their application under Section 23-A, Chapter III-A of the Act for his eviction filed on 26-11-1986 not being after a lapse of one year as contemplated by the proviso to sub-section 23-A. of the Act, is premature.

( 3. ) IT is no doubt true that in a sense on the death of the holder of property his interests therein, by devolution, stand transferred to his heir or heirs as the case may be, but the point for consideration is whether such transfer by law and not by act of any party is within the coverage of the proviso.

( 4. ) THE proviso referred to above is in these words : "provided that where a person who is landlord has acquired any accommodation or any interest therein by transfer, no application f










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top