R.C.LAHOTI
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Chintaman – Respondent
( 1. ) IN Sessions Trial No. 16/85, the Sessions Judge Bhind held the non-applicants guilty of offences punishable under Sections 326/149, 323/149 and 148 I. P. C. and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment the longest being five years rigorous imprisonment. They preferred an444 appeal. Vide order dated 13-1-87 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 281/86 this Court directed the execution of the sentences of imprisonment to be suspended under Section 389 (1), Cr. P. C. subject to their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each with one solvent surety in the like amount. The non-applicants/appellants furnished bail bonds and are thus at liberty pending appeal.
( 2. ) ON 9-9-87, an application under Section 439 (2) read with Section 482, Cr. P. C. has been filed by the State under instructions of the Law Department praying for cancellation of the bail and for further direction committing the accused/appellants to custody pending appeal on the ground that subsequent to being enlarged on bail, they have made an abuse of the privilege, they are threatening the complainant and are indulging in other criminal activities creating a terror in the village. The non-applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.