SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(MP) 48

A.P.SEN
Shyam Bihari – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS order will also govern the disposal of Misc. Criminal Case No. 32 of 1972 (Kailash Dubey v-State of M. P.) These are two petitions under Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside the judgment and sentences passed by me in Criminal Appeal No. 608 of 1969 (Awadesh Singh v. The State of M. P. ). decided on 27-10-1971.

( 2. ) HAVING heard the Parties at a considerable length. I have formed the opinion that these petitions must be dismissed. In my view, the petitioners have chosen a wrong forum for the redress of their grievances, if any. Their remedy lay by way of an appeal to the Supreme Court of India.

( 3. ) THREE questions arise for considerations in these petitions namely:

(1) Whether the High Court has any jurisdiction to review its judgment or sentences in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 561-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure? (2) Whether the judgment and sentences passed by me in appeal were a nullity, having regard to the provisions contained in rule 1 (a) (iv ). Chapter I of the High Court Rules? (3) Whether the petitioners were not served with any notices under Section 423 (1a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top