P.K.TARE, S.M.N.RAINA
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Sheocharan Radheshyam Sharma – Respondent
( 1. ) ON an order passed by this court, the Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh, was required to refer the following question for consideration by this court:
Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the dyes and colours imported on C form declaration could be held to have been used in such a manner as to absolve the dealer from liability for penalty for infringement of Section l0 (d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 ?
( 2. ) THE present reference arose on the following facts: The respondent was a registered dealer as per Section 7 (2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. In his application for registration in form Aappended to the application vide item No. 16, the respondent had mentioned the following particulars : Item 16.-The following goods or classes of goods are purchased by the dealer in the course of inter-State trade for resale or for use in manufacture of goods for sale or for use in the execution of contracts :. . (VERNACULAR MATTER OMMITED ). . (a) For resale, (b) For use in manufacture, (c) For use in the execution of contracts.
( 3. ) AT both the places the respondent had struck out the phrase underlined, namely, "for use in the execution of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.