High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
G.P.Singh and R.K.Tankha, JJ.
Praveen Kumar Gupta
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh
Decided On : Apr 13,1973
Section 367 (5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, before its amendment by Act 26 of 1955, provided that if the accused is convicted of an offence punishable with death and the Court sentences him to any punishment other than death, the Court shall in its judgment state the reason why sentence of death was not imposed. The law then was that sentence of death was the normal sentence for the offence of murder and the lesser sentence of imprisonment for life could be imposed only when the Court found extenuating circumstances in favour of the accused and these circumstances had to he stated in the judgment. After the amendment of the Code in 1955, the Court is not obliged to record reasons for not imposing the sentence of death and the question of sentence is left to the discretion of the Court.
The discretion has to be exercised not according to the notion that existed when the Penal Code was enacted but in accordance with the progressive spirit of the times. The amendment of section 367 (5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in 1955, itself suggests that the Parliament intends that the sentence of death should not be imposed except in extreme cases. The purpose of punishment is protection of society by deterring potential offenders, by preventing the actual offender from committing further offence and by reforming and turning him into a law abiding citizen.
The sentence of death is only deterrent and preventive but sentence of imprisonment for life in addition to being deterrent and preventive also gives a chance to the criminal to reform himself after his release on orders of the Government which usually takes place after he has been in the prison for 15 to 20 years depending upon the remissions earned by him. It may also be noticed that the available statistics do not justify an absolute conclusion regarding the value of death penalty as a deterrent, the evidence, such as it is, shows a relatively unimportant relation between the murder rate and the death penalty.
However, it may be assumed that professional criminals such as dacoits and hired assassins cannot be deterred by a sentence of imprisonment for to this class of criminal imprisonment is merely an occupational hazard. The sentence of death in such cases may, therefore, be justified on the ground that imprisonment for life will not be an adequate deterrent. But when the accused has no past history of being a criminal and is young and when imprisonment for life will be an adequate deterrent to the class of persons to which he belongs, it would be normally a proper exercise of discretion to impose the lesser penalty of imprisonment for life and to give him a chance to reform and to become a responsible member of society.
(Para 31)
( 1. ) THE judgment in this appeal shall also dispose of Criminal Appeals Nos. 211 and 215 of 1973 as also Criminal References Nos. 5, 6 and 7 of 1973.
( 2. ) ON 6th July 1972 there was an armed robbery in the Gun Carriage Factory Post Office, Jabalpur, at about 5-30 p. m. in which three postal employees, namely, Sitaram Chouksey, V. N. Choudhary and Durga Prasad Mishra, lost their lives. The appellants in these appeals were tried by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur, in Sessions Trial No. 100 of 1972 for offences under Sections 302, 449 and 394 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code. By the judgment delivered on 20th February 1973, Pravin Kumar Gupta (appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 171 of 1973) has been convicted under Section 302 for committing murder of V. N. Choudhary and under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code for committing murder of Sitaram Chouksey and Durga Prasad Mishra. For these offences he has been sentenced to death. He has also been convicted under Sections 449 and 394 read with Section 397 of the Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years on each count. The sentences of imprisonment are to run concurrently. Vijay Simon and Reuben Pradeep (appellants in Criminal Appeals Nos. 211 and 215 of 1973) have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 for the murder of Sitaram Chouksey, V. N. Choudhary and Durga Prasad Mishra. They have been sentenced to death for these offences. They have also been convicted under Sections 449 and 394 read with Section 397 of the Penal Code and have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years on each count. The sentences of imprisonment are to run concurrently.
( 3. ) THE G. C. F. Post Office is located in the G. C. F. Estate. The evidence shows that near the post office there are no buildings and towards at least one side of the post office there are some bushes and a small hill. The Dak and money are taken to the Head Post Office, Jabalpur, from the Factory Post Office in the evening. The post office has got, for this purpose, two vans; one is referred to as the mail van and the other cash van. The Dak is collected by the mail van and the cash by the cash van. On 6th July 1972, on which date the incident took place, the cash van had broken down and the Dak and the cash were both collected in the mail van at about 5. 10 p. m. Ganesh Prasad (P. W. 2) was the driver of the mail van with whom were Narayan Prasad (P. W. 3), the Cash Overseer of the Post Offices, and Ramnihor Mishra, (P. W. 4 ). a Police Constable. When this mail van was standing in front of the post office and Dak and cash were being collected from the post office and taken to the van, the appellants were seen together near some bushes. When the mail van moved after loading the Dak and the bag containing the cash, the appellants were seen near the road.
( 4. ) EXHIBIT P-289 is a plan of the place of occurrence which is drawn on scale. This plan was prepared by Jamna Prasad (D. W. 3) who is Assistant Foreman incharge of the Drawing Section in the factory-The plan was prepared on the date of the incident itself. A look at this plan will show that the post office consists essentially of a hall. Counters have been erected in this hall to divide it into two portions. From the side of the counters there is a half door through which one can enter the other side of the hall where the Post Master and other postal employees sit for doing their work. The quarter of the Post Master is adjacent to the post office and there is a door from which one can enter the quarter from the post office. At about 5-30 p. m. , when the incident took place, there happened to be four postal employees in the post office, namely, Sitaram Chouksey, the Post Master, V. N. Choudhary, Money Order Clerk, Durga Prasad Mishra, Savings Bank Clerk, and Abdul Hafiz Khan (P. W. 1), Telegraph Clerk. All of them were busy in their work when they suddenly noticed the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.