SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(MP) 125

P.K.TARE, G.G.SOHANI
NANDKISHORE – Appellant
Versus
SARJUDEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.M.Chafekar, S.D.Sanghi,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) IN this Letters Patent Appeal upon a certificate granted by a learned Single Judge of this Court under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, the question raised is as to the interpretation of section 12 (1) (f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. It is directed against the decree, dated 9-4-1973, passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Second Appeal No. 274 of 1971, arising out of the decree, 14-10-1971, passed by the Additional District Judge, Ujjain, in Civil First Appeal No. 11-A of 1971, arising out of the original decree, dated 16-11-1970 passed by the 1st Civil Judge, Class I, Ujjain, in Civil Suit No. 192 A of 1969.

( 2. ) THE relevant facts for understanding the question involved in this appeal are as follows. The respondent is the landlord of house bearing Municipal No. 1/302/b, situated in the city of Ujjain. The predecessor of the appellants, Pannalal, was the tenant, who held two different portions of the house as a tenant on a monthly rent under two separate contracts of tenancy. One of them related to the residential accommodation, while the other related to the non-residential accommodation for business purposes. The monthly rent of




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top