V.R.NEWASKAR
Khemchand Rajmal – Appellant
Versus
Rambabu Johrimal – Respondent
( 1. ) FACTS giving rise to the present petition are as follows:
( 2. ) NON-APPLICANT Rambabu obtained an ex parte decree for money against the petitioner Messrs. Khemchand Rajmal through Proprietor Rajmai. The decree was transferred by the Delhi Court to the Court of Civil Judge, Indore within whose jurisdiction the judgment-debtor carried on business. An application was thereupon submitted on behalf of the applicant judgment-debtor under Order 21, rule 29 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for stay of execution alleging that prior to the filing of the present execution petition by the non-applicant Rambabu, he had filed Civil Suit No. 40 of 1955 in that Court for accounts on the ground of his being the agent of the applicant which was pending and that according to the applicants estimate he was entitled to recover Rs. 1362/- over and above the amount in execution.
( 3. ) THE trial Court rejected the application on the ground that no sufficient cause had been shown for exercising the discretion in favour of the applicant. The present revision petition is directed against that order.
( 4. ) IT is contended by Mr. Jindal in support, of the petition that the lear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.