SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 222

A.H.KHAN
Mubarakali – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hamid Ali Shah, SHIV DAYAL,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE facts giving rise to this revision are that on 11-1-1957, one Mr. Bhalla made a report that when he went to the Railway Station Gola-Ka-Mandir to enquire whether empty boxes could be dispatched from Gola-Ka-Mandir Station to delhi, he found that the Station Master was at first unwilling to book them. But later on, he agreed to book empty boxes, provided Mr. Bhalla paid As, 10 per box by way of gratification. Mr. Bhalla did not agree to it. The following day when Mr. Bhalla when to the Station again, he did not find the Station Master on duty. In his place the A. S. M. was working. On being told what his purpose was, the A. S. M. climbed down to a lower figure and asked Mr. Bhalla to give him only As. 8 per box. Mr. Bhalla did not agree to this proposal also and made a report giving all these facts. Sub-Inspector Nannoram, on receiving the report laid a trap and went to the station of Gola-Ka-Mandir from where in his presence Mr. Bhalla dispatched certain boxes. The A. S. M. on duty handed him over the Railway Receipt, and, asked Mr. Bhalla to pay him ten rupees as settled before. Mr. Bhalla thereupon took out from his pocket eight rupee-notes, and, paid the amo
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top