SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(MP) 230

M.HIDAYATULLAH, B.K.CHOUDHURI, B.K.CHATURVEDI
Municipal Committee – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Sen, M.P.SRIVASTAVA,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS appeal is against an order of Bhutt, J. in Miscellaneous Petition No. 552 of 1956, decided on 21st February, 1957. It was referred to this Full Bench, but at the suggestion of counsel and with the concurrence of the learned Judges who made this reference the decision of the Full Bench has been confined only to the examination of the decision in Ramchandra Rai v. State of M. P. , Misc. Petn. No. 80 of 1950, D/- 10-8-1951 (A ).

( 2. ) THE Municipal Committee, Kareli was superseded by an order of the State government. Certain charges were framed and explanation of the Municipal committee was called for. The State Government after calling for a report from the Deputy Commissioner decided to supersede the Municipal Committee and passed an order to that effect. The question in the miscellaneous petition was whether the action of the State Government in superseding the Municipal committee was correct. The learned single Judge, who dealt with the miscellaneous petition, following the decision of a Division Bench in the above case : Misc. Petn. No. 80 of 1950 (A), held that it was not open to this Court to question the decision of the State government. The correctness o



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top