SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(MP) 1

P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Ram Dulare Balkishan and Bros. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.Khaskalam, Y.S.Dharmadhikari,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) IN this reference under Section 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, read with Section 23 (1) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, the question which we have been asked to answer is-Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the nonapplicant can be regarded as a dealer under Section 2 (c) of the C. P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, in respect of the sales of used up motor vehicles and used up parts like tyres and tubes ?

( 2. ) RAMDULARE Balkishan and Brothers of Balaghat are bus operators and carry on the business of providing transport. They own several buses and trucks. During the period from 1st January, 1957, to 31st March, 1959, the assessee sold unserviceable cars, trucks, tyres, and other used motor accessories to various persons. The value of all these sales amounted to Rs. 6,154-12-0. The Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Chhindwara, held that the assessee was a "dealer" as defined in Section 2 (c) of the Act of 1947 and accordingly assessed Ramdulare Balkishan and Brothers to sales tax on these sales. The assessee unsuccessfully appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jabalpur. Thereupon a





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top