SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(MP) 142

K.L.PANDEY, P.V.DIXIT
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Mangilal Rameshwar Dayal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.J.BHAVE,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) UNDER Section 44 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act), the Board of Revenue has referred to us the following question of law,: Whether, under Section 38 of the M. P. General. Sales Tax Act, 19. 58, read with Rule 58 of the rules thereunder, it is incumbent upon the appellate authority to give an opportunity of hearing to the appellant before summarily rejecting his appeal for non-payment of the full tax assessed that may be due, if a prayer for exemption from such tax had been made by the appellant in the memo of appeal ?

( 2. ) ON 28th August, 1959, the Sales Tax Officer, Gwalior, assessed the tax payable on sales made by the non-applicant in the year 1957-58 and directed him to pay Rs. 1,238-93 as such tax. Being aggrieved, the non-applicant appealed against the assessment in the prescribed form No. XXVI. Since he had paid only Rs. 412 out of Rs. 1,238-93, he made in the memorandum of appeal a prayer to the effect that the appeal may be admitted on part payment of the tax due. On 26th March, 1960, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner summarily dismissed the appeal under Rule 58 (1) on the ground that the full tax had n








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top