SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(MP) 87

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
P.K. Tare and K.L. Pandey, JJ.
SINGH K P
Versus
GOKHALE S K
Decided On : Sep 02,1969

Headnote:(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - S. 10-A - Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227-arbitrator under section 10-A functions quasi-judicially/though not a tribunal-power of High Court to pass a writ of certiorari.

       (2) Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227-arbitrator acting under section 10-A, Industrial Disputes Act-writ petition when lies against his decision.

       Under section 10-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, an arbitrator acts as quasi-judicial body and his decision would be subject to writs of certiorari in appropriate cases. If the Court finds that the requisite procedure as prescribed by the Act was not followed so as to confer the necessary jurisdiction on the Arbitrator to proceed with the adjudication, the High Court can in exercise of prerogative powers issue the necessary writs. AIR 1963 SC 374 relied on. [Para 8]

       (3) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - S. 10-A - reference of Industrial Dispute-no private arbitration-such a reference would be under sub-section (1) of S. 10-A - form 'C' prescribed for such agreement.

       (4) Contract Act, 1872 - S. 23 -contracting out of statutory provisions-is void.

       Industrial Disputes Act does not contemplate any private arbitration in respect of questions of public importance involving industrial disputes. If that had been the intent of the Legislature, sub-section (5) of section 10-A of the Act would not have excluded the operation of the Arbitration Act. 1940 The present arbitration agreement could not be a private arbitration agreement but as one contemplated under Sub-section (1) of section 10-A when form 'C' was used by the parties.

       Allowing the parties to contract out of the statutory provisions would be void under section 23 of the Contract Act. [Paras 9 and 10]

       (5) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - S. 10-A - procedure of arbitration - procedure based on natural justice - provisions of sub-sections (3) & (4) of section 10-A -are mandatory- provisions not followed-award is not enforceable and is invalid.

       The Arbitrator has to follow his own procedure and must act in consonance with the principles of natural justice but certain procedure has been prescribed by section 10-A which is mandatory. All parties interested in the dispute should have notice of reference of the dispute. The procedure to be followed under sub-section (3-A) is directory but sub section (4) positively Jays down that the award has to be submitted to the appropriate Government.

       The mandatory provisions as prescribed by sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 10-A not being followed, the award is not enforceable and is, therefore, invalid. [Paras 11 & l2]

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) IN this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner 1, an employee of respondent 2, National Coal Development Corporation, Ltd. , Jamuna Colliery, P. O. Kotma, challenges the award of respondent 1 (annexare 13) on the ground that the arbitrator had no jurisdiction to proceed with the arbitration proceedings in the absence of the procedure to be followed as prescribed by S. IDA of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central ).

( 2. ) RESPONDENT 2, employer, and petitioner 2, M. P. Koyla Mazdoor panchayat, a registered union, tried for conciliation of their dispute through the machinery of conciliation ; but the conciliation proceedings did not fructify. However, by an agreement dated 14 January 1966, they entered into an agreement (petitioners annexure 7) referring the industrial dispute for arbitration by the sole arbitrator, S. K. Gokhale. Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Jabalpur, for adjudication of the following points of dispute: (1) Whether the transfer of K. P. Singh; shot flrer (Gassy Mine), and G. Joshi, assistant storekeeper, was effected by the management from Jamuna Colliery to Talcher (Orissa field and Surakachar-Korba region), respectively, with a view to weaken the M. P. Koyla Mazdoor Panchayat at Jamuna Colliery. (2) Whether K. P. Singhs refusal to comply with the transfer orders was Justified and whether K. P. Singh is entitled to any relief for the period that he has remained unemployed as a result of his refusal to comply with the transfer orders. (3) What other consequential arrangements should be made on the basis of the determination of the first two issues. The parties agreed to be bound by the decision of the arbitrator.

( 3. ) AT the stage it may be relevant to reproduce Section 10a of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which is as follows: Sub-section (1 ).-Where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended and the employer and the workmen agree to refer the dispute to arbitration, they may, at any time, before the dispute has been referred under Section 10 to a labour court or tribunal or national tribunal, by a written agreement, refer the dispute to arbitration and the reference shall be to such parson or persons (including the presiding officer of a labour court or tribunal or national tribunal) as an arbitrator or arbitrators as may be specified in the arbitration agreement. Sub-section (1a. ).-Where an arbitration agreement provides for a reference of the dispute to an even number of arbitrators, the agreement shall provide for the appointment of another person as umpire who shall enter upon the reference, if the arbitrators are equally divided in their opinion, and the award of the umpire shall prevail and shall be deemed to be the arbitration award for the purposes of this Act. Sub-section (2),-An arbitration agreement referred to in Subsection (1) shall be in such form and shall be signed by the parties thereto in such manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (3 ).-A copy of the arbitration agreement shall be forwarded to the appropriate Government and the conciliation officer and the appropriate Government shall, within (one month) from the date of the receipt of such copy, publish the same in the official gazette. Sub-section (3a ).-Where an industrial dispute has been referred to arbitration and the appropriate Government is satisfied that the parsons making the reference represent the majority of each party, the appropriate Government may, within the time referred to in Sub-section (3), issue a notification in such manner as may be prescribed; and when any such notification is issued, the employers and workmen who are not parties to the arbitration agreement but are concerned in the dispute, shall be given an opportunity of presenting their case before the arbitrator or arbitrators. Sub-section (4 ).-The arbitrator or arbitrators shall investigate the dispute and submit to the appropriate Government the arbitration award signed by t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top