SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(MP) 4

K.L.PANDEY
STATE OF MP – Appellant
Versus
FIRM HAJI SK FAIZULLA ALLABUX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ku.Rama Gupta, R.K.Shrivastava,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THIS appeal by the judgment debtor is directed against an order dated 16 November 1966 whereby the District Judge, Rewa, declined to order restitution consequent upon variation of a money decree by the Supreme court on the ground that it was not covered by the directions given by this court under Order 45, rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The judgment debtor too has filed an application for such directions, if necessary [miscellanea is Civil Case No. 119 of 1967]. This order shall dispose of that application so.

( 2. ) THE fact material for the disposal of this appeal are these. The res-indent filed Civil Suit No. 36 of 1952 in the Court of the District Judge, Rewa, aiming Rs. 22,996-8-8. The Judge awarded a decree for Rs. 554-11-0 only gainst the judgment-debtor. In appeal, the Judicial Commissioner, Vindhya pradesh, enhanced that amount to Rs. 20,307-14-8. The judgment-debtor an appeal to the Supreme Court (Civil Appeal No. 334 of 1956. The supreme Court reduced the amount to Rs. 17,320-5-8 and gave directions for its.

( 3. ) ON 17 January 1964, the judgment-debtor made to this Court an location under Order 45, rule 15 of the Code. On that application, this









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top