SHANTANU KEMKAR
Ponnamma John – Appellant
Versus
Vijaykumar Tanwar (deceased) through Legal Representatives – Respondent
Shantanu Kemkar, J.
1. Initially the petitioner had filed this Misc. Civil Case under Order XLV Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') read with Article 133(1)(a) & (b) and Article 134A of the Constitution of India and under Rules 1 and 2 of Chapter XXI of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008 seeking a certificate under Article 133(1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution in accordance with Form No. 31. However, on a preliminary objection being raised by the respondents, the petitioner prayed for amendment of the prayer made in the MCC and the said prayer to amend was allowed. Thereafter as amended the present MCC is treated and heard as a petition under Order XLV Rule 2 of the CPC read with Rules 1 and 2 of Chapter XXI of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008 with a prayer to grant a certificate in terms of Rule 3 and Rule 7 of Order XLV of the CPC on the substantial questions of law stated in the memo of petition.
2. According to the petitioner following two substantial questions of law of general importance need to be decided by Hon'ble the Supreme Court:
(1) The interpretation of Section 3 (1) (b) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.