SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 588

SANJAY YADAV
S. M. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Commissioner – Respondent


ORDER

Sanjay Yadav, J.

1. Heard.

2. Correctness of order dated 4-8-2008 passed by Additional Collector, Panna, District Panna is being questioned in present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3. By order dated 4-8-2008 the Additional Collector, Panna, while invoking powers under Sections 307 and 308 of M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961 (referred to as Act of 1961) allowed the appeal preferred by Respondent No. 4 and set aside the death certificate dated 21-4-2008 issued by Registrar (Births and Deaths).

4. Relevant facts briefly are that, wife of the Petitioner Smt. Rajkumari Sharma expired on 16-4-2008. The death was informed to Registrar (Births and Deaths), i.e., Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Panna as required under Section 8 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (hereinafter shall be referred to as Act of 1969): consequent whereof certificate (in common parlance known as death certificate), was issued on 21-4-2008 by the Registrar (Births and Deaths) as per the stipulations contained under Section 12 of the Act of 1969.

5. Respondent No. 4 who happens to be the brother of deceased Rajkumari Sharma being aggrieved of the issuance of d











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top