SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 776

DIPAK MISRA
Prakash Jain – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Saxena – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Shri Prashant Jaiswal, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: Shri S.A. Sobhani, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Dipak Misra, J.

1. In this civil revision preferred under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') challenge is to the order dated 23-12-99 passed in C.S. No. 236-A/99 by the IIIrd Civil Judge, Class-II, Bhopal.

2. The facts as have been undraped are that the non- applicant No. 1 initiated the aforesaid civil litigation for rendition of accounts, injunction and appointment of receiver on the ground that the firm had already been dissolved as per the terms and conditions of the Partnership deed. After the defendants/ applicants entered contest, they moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code to reject the plaint on the ground as the firm is not registered a suit cannot be instituted as envisaged under Section 69 of the Partnership Act, 1932 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The learned Trial Judge on consideration of the material on record negatived the prayer of the applicants/ defendants. The said order is cause of grievance of the present revisionists.

3. Assailing the aforesaid order it is contended by Mr. Prashant Jaiswal that the reasonings ascribed by the learned Trial Judge are unsound in as much as the embargo a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top