R.P.GUPTA
Vijay Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Dineshchand Bansal – Respondent
R.P. Gupta, J.
1. This is an appeal by the defendant against whom the appellate Court of III Addl. Distt. Judge, Morena in Civil Appeal No. 1-A/96 by judgment dated 20-7-95 passed a decree that the disputed Gali was joint ownership of the plaintiff/respondent with a right to use it jointly and a further injunction that the defendant will not raise any construction in this joint Gali and defendant will not obstruct the plaintiff from opening his doors and windows in this Gali and a direction to remove whatever wall or construction has been raised by the defendant. By this judgment the appellate Court has reversed the judgment of Addl. Civil Judge Class I, Morena in case No. 102-A/92 decided on 20-7-95. The trial Court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff which was for the relief now granted by the appellate Court. The suit was filed on 10-4-89.
2. It was a simple suit in respect of a portion described as disputed Gali by red colour in the site plan filed with the plaint. The claim was that the plaintiff purchased the adjoining land enclosed with green colour lines in that plan from Savitribai vide sale deed Ex. P-1 on 17-7-88. In this sale deed all the rights belonging to Savit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.