SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 66

R.B.DIXIT
Sukhia alias Sushma – Appellant
Versus
Gambhira – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: J.P. Shrivastava, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: None

JUDGMENT

R.B. Dixit, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 15-2-1995 passed in Civil Appeal No. 2-A/94 by Fifth Additional Judge to District Judge, Gwalior, whereby decree and judgment of Ninth Civil Judge Second Class, Gwalior, passed in Civil Suit No. 228A/94 was confirmed, the defendant-appellant has come up in appeal praying for dismissal of the suit of the plaintiff-respondent.

2. The plaintiff-respondent had filed a civil suit against the appellant seeking relief of perpetual injunction restraining defendant from making any interference in the suit plot allegedly obtained by him on 30 years' lease from the Government of Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Kshetron Ke Bhumiheen Vyakti. (pattadhriti Ka Pradan Kiya Jana Adhikaron) Adhiniyam, 1984. According to the plaint averment, plaintiff was granted patta of a plot measuring 8.50 x 6.50 meters whereon he had constructed a Pator and Chhapar over the said plot. The defendant's house is situated in the north of the suit plot in the Shabad Pratan Ashram and defendant had raised a wall on the suit land causing interference in possession of the plaintiff.

3. The resume of the written statement was that plaintiff is in possession of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top