SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 145

T.N.SINGH
Rajkumar Gajadhar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T.N. Singh, J.

1. The short question that arises in this appeal is on the interpretation of Section 31(1-A) of M. P. Excise Act, 1915, which I quote : -

"(1-A) Before making an order cancelling or suspending a licence, permit or pass under sub-section (1), the authority aforesaid shall record in writing the reasons for the proposed action, furnish to the holder thereof a brief statement of the same and afford him a reasonable opportunity of being heard."

2. Plaintiff has appealed as his suit has been decreed in part only in which he had prayed that the recovery warrant issued against him for realisation of Rs. 34,539.50 be declared void. Trial Court has granted him partial relief and there is no appeal by the State. Admittedly, the warrant was issued for recovery from the plaintiff of kists of duty due payable by him under liquor licence issued to him along with the revenue loss which the defendant/State suffered on account of resale of two shops which had been settled with the plaintiff.

3. It is not denied and the fact found admitted is that there was default on the part of the plaintiff in regard to non-payment timely of the kist due under the licences, Exs. P.-l and P-2. Ad











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top