SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 328

S.K.DUBEY, R.C.LAHOTI
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

S.K. Dubey, J.

1. This order shall also govern disposal of M.M. No. 82 of 1991 (Satyendra Singh and 31 others v. State ofMad-hya Pradesh through Registrar, Co-operative Societies, M.P., Bhopal and Ors.), as both the petitions were heard analogously.

2. All the pctilioncrs by this petition have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other suitable writ, direction or order for quashmcnt of the notice and orders of termination of their services passed on December 1/5, 1990 (Annexurcs P/1-A to P/1-Q) by the Manager, Land Development Co-operative Bank Ltd., Vidisha, the respondent No. 5, while the petitioners in M.M. No. 82 of 1991 have challenged the resolution dated November 14, 1990 (Annexurc P/1) of the Board and the notice and order of termination dated November 19, 1990 (Annexure P/3), passed and issued by the respondent No. 5.

3. The petitioners contend in their petition that they were appointed on their respective posts and then were regularised, but because of political reasons one month's notice of termination of their services was given in violation of the rule of 'last come first go' and without complying with the pre-conditions of Section 25F of th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top