SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 496

A.K.MATHUR, S.K.KULSHRESTHA
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chandravati – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.K. Kulshrestha, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the insurance company under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 16.4.1987 passed in M.A. No. 323 of 1977 (Krishnachand Gupta v. Chandravati).

2. The respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, the heirs of the deceased Gaya Prasad, had filed claim under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, for compensation in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- on the ground that Gaya Prasad, a passenger in the said bus of whom the respondent No. 1 was the widow and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were the children, had received fatal injuries while going from Satna to Simariya as a result of an accident. It was alleged that a truck bearing registration No. MPJ 5422 was coming from the opposite direction but on account of the rashness and negligence of the driver of the bus in which the said Gaya Prasad was travelling, at the last moment, the driver swerved the vehicle resulting in the bus turning turtle. Gaya Prasad was thrown out and he died due to the injuries thus received. The said claim was made against the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 as the owner and driver of the bus respectively and the present appellant as th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top