SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 653

R.P.GUPTA, A.K.MATHUR
Sanctus Drugs Pharmaceuticals . . . – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has by this petition prayed that the provisions of Section 143(1A)(a)(B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, be declared as ultra vires the Constitution of India. It is also prayed that the demand raised under Section 143(1A) of the Act for a sum of Rs. 1,44,383, (annexures "P-2" and "P-3") be quashed and the notice issued on November, 16/23, 1994 (annexure "P-10"), under Section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act attaching the bank account of petitioner No. 1 in the State Bank of Indore be also quashed. Likewise, it is prayed that the notice dated September 1, 1994, annexure "P-11", issued by respondent No. 3 be quashed.

2. Petitioner No. 1 is a private limited company carrying on the business of manufacturing of drugs. Petitioner No. 2 is the managing director and the shareholder in petitioner No. 1-company and is interested in the various affairs of the company. Petitioner No. 1 filed a return showing a business loss of Rs. 14,09,666 and a carry forward of loss of the preceding two years, i.e., assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91. Total loss inclusive of investment allowance and depreciation for three years from 1989-90 to 1991-92 is amounting to Rs. 67,17,825.

3. Re
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top