SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 196

T.N.SINGH, R.C.LAHOTI
Arjunsingh Ganeshram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard counsel.

2. Vires or no vires, the matter need not prolong any further in this Court. We have been hearing time and again that the vires of Rule 88 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 is being considered at the Main Seat. We have taken a different view on examination of the provisions of Section 59 of the New Act and reading that along with Section 217 of the Act. Obviously, Rule 88 was framed to give effect to the provisions of Section 59 and that position is being kept in view. We extract the Rule : --

"88. Age of motor vehicle for the purpose of national permit. -- (1) No national permit shall be granted in respect of a goods carriage which is more than nine years old at any point of time.

(2) A national permit shall be deemed to be invalid from the date the vehicle covered by the permit completes nine years from the date of its initial registration.

Explanation. -- For the purpose of this rule, the period of nine years shall be computed from the date of initial registration of the goods carriage concerned."

3. We entertain no doubt about the position that when a national permit is granted exercising power under the New Act, the provisions of Rule 88 would apply becaus





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top