SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(MP) 255

A.R.TIWARI
Sushma W/O Maheshkumar And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Devraj Pyareram Verma – Respondent


ORDER

A.R. Tiwari, J.

1. This appeal, preferred under Section 32 of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short 'The Act') Has been directed against the order dated 4-3-1993 passed by the IInd Addl. Judge to the Court of District Judge, Indore in M. A. No. 2/93 thereby maintaining the order dated 22-1-1993 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore in Case No. A-90(4)/47/92.

2. The order passed by the Rent Controlling Authority and affirmed by the Lower Appellate Court is to the effect that the appellants should restore the essential service temporarily after effecting the repairs in the accommodation used as latrine and bath-room.

3. The matrix in short is that the respondent is the tenant in House No. 8 Palasia Hana (New Palasia Street No. 4), Indore. The appellants became the landlords of the respondent after purchase of the suit-house by a registered sale-deed dated 5-11-1991. The relationship of landlord and tenant is thus not in dispute. In October, 1992, the appellants started construction in the suit-house. On 5-11-1992, the employees of the Indore Municipal Corporation demolished the construction commenced by the appellants. In the process of this demolition, th


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top