SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(MP) 479

R.D.SHUKLA
Shantabai Dube And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Kanhaiyalal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.D. Shukla, J.

1. The revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.8.1993 of the VIIth Addl. District Judge, Indore, passed in C.S. No. 2-B of 1989, whereby the applicants' application under Order 22, Rule 1 read with rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, has been rejected on the principle of actio personalis moritur cum persona.

2. The brief history of the case is that the original plaintiff, Mohanlal, filed a suit with the assertion that the defendant (non-applicant there) caused injuries to him on 29.4.1981. He, therefore, sustained fracture in his hand. He had to undergo the treatment and suffered pain and agony and was under plaster for a few months. He, therefore, claimed Rs. 99,000/- as the damages.

3. The defendants-non-applicants denied the plaint allegations. The case was pending in the court for trial.

4. During the pendency of the case Mohanlal died and, thereafter, the present applicant, i.e., Shantabai w/o Mohanlal and Kamalkumar s/o Mohanlal filed an application for substitution under Order 22, Rules 1 and 3 of Code of Civil Procedure.

5. After hearing the parties the learned trial Judge dismissed the application for substitution and consequently dismisse












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top