SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 316

U.L.BHAT, M.V.TAMASKAR
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Rama Devi Jaiswal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

U.L. Bhat, C.J.

1. These are applications filed by the Revenue under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute relates to assessments for the years 1971-72, 1972-73 and 1973-74 as also penalty proceedings for the year 1973-74.

2. The respondent's husband, the late Ganesh Prasad Jaiswal, filed a return for the assessment year 1972-73 on February 29, 1973, on behalf of his Hindu undivided family. He showed the income of Rs. 32,634. The income was an income from immovable property as well as income from two foreign liquor shops and share of income from three firms. On January 20, 1975, he filed a revised return showing the income of Rs. 29,570 as an individual and contending that there was a partial partition of the Hindu undivided family on March 30, 1970. According to his version, in the partial partition, the movables were divided amongst the members while the immovable property was left undivided. He did not maintain regular books of account. On February 10, 1974, certain documents were seized. They showed investment in the immovable property in the names of two sons and obtaining country liquor contracts in their names. The assessee was managing by virtue of t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top