SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 312

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, A.S.TRIPATHI
Somti Bai – Appellant
Versus
Mishri Lal Chhoudhary – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. A common order is being passed in this appeal, Misc. Appeal No. 142 of 1989, and in appeals, Misc. Appeal Nos. 143 and 144, both of 1989, all preferred by the claimants against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Shivpuri, passed on 25.9.1989 in relation to an accident to truck No. MPW 4832.

2. Facts not in dispute are-that truck No. MPW 4832 while carrying in its body labourers overturned on 5.4.1984 some time in the midnight in which two labourers, by name Hotam and Harvilas, died and the third Deo Pal suffered injuries resulting in fractures of his bones. The Claims Tribunal awarded to the claimants of the deceased in each case a compensation in the sum of Rs. 28,000/- and a sum of Rs. 12,000/- to the injured labourer, Deo Pal. The Claims Tribunal held only owner and driver of the vehicle jointly and severally liable for payment of compensation. The Tribunal totally absolved the insurance company from any liability by holding that the three above-named victims of the accident were not employed on the truck by the owner of the vehicle. They were labourers of the mine-owner and were carried in the truck as gratuitous passengers. The Tr

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top