SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 483

R.S.GARG
Nera Bai W/O Bramh Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Pusia Bai W/O Bittu Sahu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.S. Garg, J.

1. The appellants/plaintiffs being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 22-9-1986 passed in Civil Regular Appeal No. 12A/83 by the learned Additional District Judge, Durg, reversing the judgment and decree dated 9-3-1983 passed in Civil Suit No. 15A/81 by the learned Civil Judge, Class I, have preferred this appeal.

2. The plaintiffs filed the suit alleging that the agricultural lands ad measuring 1.386 hectares of village Ghoghapuri and 1.222 hectares of village Chaneli were belonging to deceased Hinchharam and he was recorded Bhumiswami of the said lands in the revenue papers. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 are the grand-daughters of Hinchharam and plaintiff No. 4 is the widow and plaintiff No. 5 is the daughter of Hinchharam. It was submitted that defendant Pusiabai claiming to be daughter of deceased,- Hinchharam filed an application before the revenue authorities for declaring her rights in the property and mutation over it. The plaintiffs contended that defendant Pusiabai in collusion with the Village Patwari and the revenue inspector got her name mutated in the revenue papers alleging that her mother Puttubai was legally wedded wife of Hinchharam. The plaintiffs















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top